Middle East

Any good policy approach must take into account Israel’s security, its diplomatic objectives and relationship with its Druze citizens.

The Jewish state owes a debt to the Druze and a moral duty to stop the massacres – yet it must not jeopardise a fragile opening to the regime.

The high-stakes diplomatic encounter comes as Trump seeks to capitalize on military victory against Iran’s nuclear program to accelerate Middle East peace processes, creating both extraordinary opportunities and complex challenges for Israel’s long-term security interests.

Without the leading figures who directed the war effort from Hamas’s side, the group will struggle to function effectively, though it will likely continue to resist a comprehensive hostage deal.

Within a few years, Iran could resume its nuclear ambitions – this time with a bolstered ballistic arsenal and possibly intercontinental capabilities, posing a direct threat to the United States.

Only the US — trusted by both sides — can broker an arrangement that secures their vital interests and outlines a shared future in Syria.

One cannot undervalue Nasrallah’s importance in promoting Hezbollah and relations with Iran.

Most in the West believe an Egyptian-Israeli war is unthinkable. That assumption should be reexamined.

Israel and US must exert maximum effort to prevent Iran from rebuilding Hamas, or risk erasing IDF’s achievements in the war and enabling the Hamas terrorists to carry out another massacre.

Riyadh is cautiously exploring its influence in Syria while already leaving a significant mark in Lebanon. What should Israel do about it?