Why is Iran’s birth rate plummeting?

The Palestinian Authority is just as bad as Hamas

The message: Neutralizing Iran comes befor normalization with Riyadh

Saudi Arabia offers to renew aid to PA 

Iran’s Internal Implosion and Growing Aggression

Israel on Its Tiptoes: Facing a Shifting Geopolitical Reality
The Mecca pact is just a show
Does Hamas’s new course look like the old one?...
Judea and Samaria: Israel’s Most Acute Security Threat
Robust defense readiness for Israel
A Slow but Steady Implosion
Home » In the Media » Page 7
Category:

In the Media

image_pdfimage_print
Beyond Containment: Israel’s Shift to Action Amid U.S.-Iran Talks
In the Media

Beyond Containment: Israel’s Shift to Action Amid U.S.-Iran Talks

Prof. Kobi Michael
Prof. Kobi Michael

Prof. Kobi Michael clarifies that the upcoming MOU is only the beginning of a 60-day negotiation process and expresses skepticism regarding a successful final agreement due to deep gaps on nuclear and regional issues.

He further asserts that Israel must continue military action against Hezbollah to ensure its security, even if it causes tension with the United States administration’s diplomatic efforts.

The full interview took place on ILTV on June 15, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
ההסכם הוא תחילת סוף המצוקה הכלכלית הקשה באיראן shutterstock - Mahir Asadli
In the Media

”Lebanon’s inclusion in the agreement is a gift to Iran”

Meir Ben Shabbat
Meir Ben Shabbat

Meir Ben Shabbat: Firstly this is an MOU, which is essentially a temporary agreement for an interim period during which there will be in-depth discussions, and not a final agreement. The issues, especially the nuclear issue, have not yet been agreed on, and therefore it is not possible to compare it to the Obama agreement – we can only do so after the final agreement.

But even without waiting for the final agreement, what has already been agreed upon is enough to substantiate the concerns in Jerusalem,” Ben-Shabbat adds. “Firstly, an agreement with Iran – and this is true of any agreement – grants legitimacy to the extremist regime and gives it the most important thing for it: survival, hope and resources for reconstruction.

The full interview was published in Globes on June 15, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

ההסכם הוא תחילת סוף המצוקה הכלכלית הקשה באיראן shutterstock - Mahir Asadli
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
A Reflection of General Weakness
In the Media

A Reflection of General Weakness

Dr. Raphael BenLevi
Dr. Raphael BenLevi

Dr. Rafael BenLevi argues that the proposed deal reflects American weakness and fails to address Israel’s primary security concerns, such as Iran’s nuclear program and missile capabilities.

He also warns that the involvement of hostile regional moderators like Qatar and Pakistan skews negotiations against Israeli interests, while emphasizing Israel’s determination to take independent action against grave national security threats.

The full interview took place on CNNnews18 on June 15, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
Palestinian Authority to hold presidential elections in 2027, Mahmoud Abbas says shutterstock - a katz
In the Media

Palestinian Authority to hold presidential elections in 2027, Mahmoud Abbas says

Prof. Kobi Michael
Prof. Kobi Michael

Prof. Kobi Michael: Abbas’s announcement was essentially the 90-year-old’s plan to use the “same maneuvers to run away from any significant reforms” and to maintain the “last drops of legitimacy.”

Abbas’s move might be more convincing for Western clients who are in favor of the Palestinians and support them under any conditions.

Published in The Jerusalem Post, June 14, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

Palestinian Authority to hold presidential elections in 2027, Mahmoud Abbas says shutterstock - a katz
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
Beyond the Two-State Solution: A New Regional Architecture
In the Media

Beyond the Two-State Solution: A New Regional Architecture

Prof. Kobi Michael
Prof. Kobi Michael

Prof. Kobi Michael argues that a two-state solution is currently unviable due to deep internal Palestinian divisions and their refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish nation-state, suggesting instead a “new regional architecture” that addresses the Iranian threat.

He further contends that international recognition of a Palestinian state is counterproductive because it discourages bilateral negotiations and ignores the necessity of eliminating Hamas and reforming the Palestinian Authority.

The full interview took place on NewsX World on June 12, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
למי קראת קורי עכביש? מצבו האמיתי של חיזבאללה נחשף shutterstock - mahdi313
In the Media

Hezbollah’s spider’s web is unraveling

Dr. Yossi Mansharof
Dr. Yossi Mansharof

Dr. Yossi Mansharof: Hezbollah’s image as Lebanon’s protector collapsed long ago. But now its image as the protector of the Shiites is also beginning to crumble. Hezbollah is at a low point in terms of its legitimacy, both inside the country and within the Shiite community. This phenomenon bothers Hezbollah so much that it openly declares it is willing to go to civil war to change its weakening status in Lebanon. Unfortunately, Lebanon’s historical memory means the government and the public will do everything to avoid that. After all, Hezbollah is still the most armed and powerful body in the country.

Published in  Israel Hayom, June  11, 2026.  

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

למי קראת קורי עכביש? מצבו האמיתי של חיזבאללה נחשף shutterstock - mahdi313
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
Beyond the UN: Redefining Israel's Global Partnerships
In the Media

Beyond the UN: Redefining Israel’s Global Partnerships

Asher Fredman
Asher Fredman

Asher Fredman emphasizes the necessity for Israel to respond with full force against Hezbollah leaders in Beirut while highlighting the existential threat posed by Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its regional terror proxies.

He discusses the resilience of the Abraham Accords and the evolution of a new U.S.-aligned regional architecture. He also advocates transforming Israel’s relationship with the U.S. from military aid to a broad strategic partnership.

Finally he critiques the United Nations for its bureaucratic waste and infiltration by terrorist organizations, suggesting that democratic nations should disengage from the UN and create more effective alternative international frameworks.

The full interview took place on ILTV on June 10, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
Strikes highlight ‘asymmetry’ in power dynamics between U.S. and Israel לפי סעיף 27 א' לחוק זכויות יוצרים
In the Media

Strikes highlight ‘asymmetry’ in power dynamics between U.S. and Israel

Prof. Kobi Michael
Prof. Kobi Michael

Prof. Kobi Michael: An Israeli response should have been expected. That Iran launched its strikes in retaliation for Israel’s actions in Lebanon was something that Israel will not tolerate.

Despite Trump’s comments, it was important to look to the president’s actions, rather than his words, adding that even if Trump is not very happy about Israel’s response, he was likely to tolerate it.

Published in NBC News, June 08, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

Strikes highlight ‘asymmetry’ in power dynamics between U.S. and Israel לפי סעיף 27 א' לחוק זכויות יוצרים
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
Israel’s Sovereignty and the Iranian Threat
In the Media

Israel’s Sovereignty and the Iranian Threat

Prof. Kobi Michael
Prof. Kobi Michael

Prof. Kobi Michael emphasized that Israel must maintain its sovereign right to defend itself and retaliate against Iranian and proxy attacks, even if this leads to friction with the U.S. administration.

He also expressed deep skepticism about reaching a deal with the current Iranian regime, insisting that any future agreement must explicitly require Iran to stop its public threats to destroy the State of Israel.

The full interview took place on ILTV on June 8, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
Iran recognizes Lebanon as a friction point between Israel and the US
In the Media

Iran recognizes Lebanon as a friction point between Israel and the US

Elie Klutstein
Elie Klutstein

Elie Klutstein: The Iranian threat isn’t directed only at Israel, but also to the Americans and President Trump. Iran recognizes that the Lebanon issue is a friction point between Israel and the US, and it is trying to attack it in order to expand the split between the two countries They know Israel doesn’t want to stop its military campaign in Lebanon, and they are talking to President Trump, because they know he’s the one who can pressure Israel.

Trump doesn’t read the map well when it comes to the Iranians. He ought to have responded in a much firmer way to their aggressive acts in the Straight of Hormuz and when they attacked American ships and troops, and since he failed to do that – the Iranian are now bolder, and they have more courage to try expanding this method and force more concessions in the negotiations.

The full interview was published in Kan English, on June 8, 2026.

*The opinions expressed in Misgav publications are the authors’ alone.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
Skip to content