-
Security vetting is not enough: Gaza’s new police must demonstrate a genuine break with perpetual refugeehood and continued conflict.
-
For Washington, there is genuine risk. Iran’s leadership may conclude that it can no longer tolerate a humiliation and launch a direct attack on Israel. That would give Israel grounds for a broad counterattack and could draw the United States into precisely the escalation Trump has sought to avoid. Tehran could also claim that Israel deliberately tried to provoke an Iranian response in order to force Washington into an all-out war.
-
Ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s diplomatic visit to Washington, the Israeli defense establishment and decision-makers stand at a critical crossroads. Naturally, the strategic discussion with the American administration focuses on …
-
It is time for establishment of a synagogue to solidify Jewish/Israeli rights on Har HaBayit.
-
When hostile regimes declare their intention to destroy the Jewish state, the country has the right and duty to take preventive action.
-
Four months into the Iran campaign, the US risks repeating Vietnam by relying on gradual pressure over decisive victory.
-
Israel is investing tens of millions of dollars to stem the loss of support in the United States. According to a report in Haaretz, the government is significantly expanding its …
-
The international community still does not comprehend the deep changes in Israeli national security thinking, which will not change much under the next Israeli government – whoever heads it.
-
Western observers tend to dismiss the new supreme leader’s threats as mere rhetoric. In reality, revenge is an ideological imperative that Iran has sought to put into practice by recruiting operatives and activating proxies inside the US.
-
Against enemies of this kind, deterrence cannot be relied upon. Only prevention and the denial of capabilities can provide real security.