-
Part of the Israeli public thinks Israel should advance full sovereignty over Judea and Samaria in response to Western recognition of a Palestinian state.
-
Rigid obedience to the law without understanding its purpose may result in the failure to defeat Hamas – just as rigid legalism once led to Jerusalem’s destruction.
-
Hamas draws encouragement from the success of the “hunger in Gaza” campaign and the responses it generated worldwide and in Israel. They are also pleased with the connection made between the Palestinian statehood recognition initiative and the war in the Strip.
-
When Israel seeks to offer Palestinians the opportunity to access aid in a secure area, it is inexplicably met with skepticism and resistance. Why is Gaza an exception?
-
Hamas currently believes the momentum is in its favor and is hardening its positions. Advancing a voluntary migration plan would pressure the terrorist organization and also address allegations of starvation in Gaza. On the ground, it’s possible to shift the situation without increasing risk to Israeli troops.
-
This week, the world was fed another lie: that Israeli troops deliberately opened fire on Palestinians waiting for food in Gaza. The usual chorus responded on cue — crying “massacre” and “war …
-
This sort of strategic maneuver would have far-reaching implications.
-
Many differences explain the gap between the IDF’s situation in the northern theater and in the strip – geography, Israel’s goal, the political situation and of course the hostage issue. But victory is still possible in Gaza too, and it depends mainly on us.
-
On March 23, the Israel Defense Forces made a tragic error in Gaza, resulting in the deaths of nine humanitarian aid workers, along with six Hamas terrorists who were embedded among them. …
-
A war can be both morally justified and legally constrained. Israel’s campaign against Hamas is exactly that. It was not launched lightly or recklessly—it was waged in defense of life, sovereignty and the rule of law.